Skip to comments.
Physicist to Present New Exact Solution of Einstein's Gravitational Field Equation [Anti-Gravity!]
PhysOrg.com ^
| 11 February 2006
| Staff
Posted on 02/11/2006 4:31:06 PM PST by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-223 next last
I donno about this one, but Dr. Felber seems like he's had a responsible career.
To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
SciencePing |
An elite subset of the Evolution list. See the list's explanation at my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail to be added or dropped. |
|
|
|
2
posted on
02/11/2006 4:32:15 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
To: PatrickHenry
This article was posted next year.
3
posted on
02/11/2006 4:32:35 PM PST
by
REDWOOD99
To: PatrickHenry
Sure. What news. I can just see flying cars in the future. Not a happy thought for anyone in Hampton Roads who has to contend with the drivers from h$ll here.
4
posted on
02/11/2006 4:33:05 PM PST
by
OpusatFR
To: PatrickHenry
You wonder why the Klingons have not paid us a visit, then.
5
posted on
02/11/2006 4:33:12 PM PST
by
Brilliant
To: PatrickHenry
Human travel near the speed of light has already been proven and demonstrated countless times already by the French when they retreat.
6
posted on
02/11/2006 4:33:34 PM PST
by
Screamname
(My name is Uninterested Kevin, monkey cousin of Curious George.)
To: PatrickHenry
Felber's research shows that any mass moving faster than 57.7 percent of the speed of light will gravitationally repel other masses lying within a narrow 'antigravity beam' in front of it. The closer a mass gets to the speed of light, the stronger its 'antigravity beam' becomes. Oh??? If that is truly the case, one of the big barriers to FTL/near C travel vanishes. That was hitting individual atoms at that speed would generate a lethal shower of X-rays and secondary particles.
7
posted on
02/11/2006 4:36:49 PM PST
by
null and void
(<---- Aged to perfection, and beyond...)
To: PatrickHenry
The jury is still out on whether Einstein's equations on general relativity were right, though. That's why they sent up a sattelite last year to test them.
Special relativity is the one that has been proven beyond any reasonable doubt.
8
posted on
02/11/2006 4:37:22 PM PST
by
Brilliant
To: PatrickHenry
Man someday may travel at the speed of light, but bureaucracies will still require at least 30 days to investigate customer complaints.
9
posted on
02/11/2006 4:37:44 PM PST
by
silverleaf
(Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
To: Screamname
10
posted on
02/11/2006 4:38:06 PM PST
by
Fiddlstix
(Tagline Repair Service. Let us fix those broken Taglines. Inquire within(Presented by TagLines R US))
To: Brilliant
A lot of science geeks are "folding"! For more info, please join us on this thread.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1572512/posts?q=1&&page=1#1
11
posted on
02/11/2006 4:38:44 PM PST
by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: PatrickHenry
Well, I don't know anywhere near enough to realistically comment on this, but I'll zip an email to a theoretical physicist friend of mine and get his comments.
Long distance space travel would be real cool and I'll volunteer to be the first to go, one way or round trip.
To: PatrickHenry

Sit Down, Shut Up and Hold On cause HERE WE GO AGAIN, AGAIN, AGAIN, AGAIN, AGAIN...
To: REDWOOD99
14
posted on
02/11/2006 4:40:27 PM PST
by
ANGGAPO
(LayteGulfBeachClub)
To: PatrickHenry
To: PatrickHenry
Paging Wendell Urth...
BTW, PH, is Physicist on your list? [From the title of the thread, it seems like we should congratulate him ;-) ]
Cheers!
16
posted on
02/11/2006 4:43:18 PM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: PatrickHenry
I was gonna do this, but I had to fertilize the lawn this weekend.
17
posted on
02/11/2006 4:44:49 PM PST
by
keithtoo
(It's STILL not safe to vote Democrat)
To: PatrickHenry
I also dunno about this one. There are an infinite number of possible solutions. Einstein rejected a 5-dimensional solution because it didn't feel right, which if we might use Einstein's gut as a guide, makes solutions less than nessarily true even if they are exact.
18
posted on
02/11/2006 4:44:50 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
To: PatrickHenry
NasaSpaceFlight.com is carrying the story, too...
An abstract from one of his papers on the subject (paper is readable in PDF)
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0505098
Shows up in Nasa Daily, too... for Feb 10.
Looks fairly legit, not a crackpot physicist.
19
posted on
02/11/2006 4:46:34 PM PST
by
Knitting A Conundrum
(Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
To: PatrickHenry
I donno about this one, but Dr. Felber seems like he's had a responsible career. I just object to the idea of referring to it as "The Felber Drive"..
" Cap'n, the Felbers are out, we canna escape the Darwinians ! "
" That strange feeling as we approach Light Speed is known as the Felber Effect.."
" We're approaching Felber Speed, Sir ! "
No, I don't like it.. I don't like it at all....
20
posted on
02/11/2006 4:46:50 PM PST
by
Drammach
(In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king..)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-223 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson