Replies

Not quite able to get outside that box - are we?

That was your implication with this scintillating statement...

Uhhh - nope, that implication was merely your assumption. And what is more amazing, when I corrected you, you make the same mistake - of assuming again. I hope you realize that in a given situation there is often other explanations beyond your original assumption (thus my pointing out your need to get outside the box).

So would you like a final try? I'll give you 2 hints.
1. I have a high regard for pharmaceuticals (so..not a Scientologist).
2. Try re-reading your post #20.

And if you've lost track, my original point it was in reply to your post #20:
"The most ignorant statement made at FR today."

Hopefully this helps...