Also, there are many other things that make the IPCC not exactly a source that is 100% trustworthy.
As I said, I don't see the value in reading biased sources. I'd still take IPCC, NAS, AAAS over organisations that receive funding from oil companies any day
Thank you guys so much for everything.
My opinion is that global warming is crock, but I do not have the numbers and studies to prove it.
So, I read the junkscience article. I need some time to go through all the resources (thanks so much!) but from what I've read, temperatures are going up, though not drastically, and this temperature can be welcomed.
Then why are the artic caps increasing?
I read the junkscience article and crichton's wonderful speech on environmentalism.
I swore I replied...
My opinion is that humans destroying the earth is crap, and greenhouse gases and global warming is not a disastrous issue. I just need the facts and studies to back myself up - just for personal interest (at the moment).
Anyways, thanks for all the replies and resources! Great stuff!
I haven't gone through it all yet, but two questions:
1. How *exactly* do envirowhackos make money on this global warming scheme. It is easy to beat around the bush, but can you guys give some exact examples of corruption?
2. As Crichton pointed out, the ice caps are expanding and the desert is shrinking. How is this the case if the temperature is still rising?