Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wouldntbprudent
Here's a judge who rejects the legislator's conclusions

It's not the judge who is doing the rejecting

At issue in the Kansas case is what the Legislature meant when it wrote the statute to say that doctors and others must have a "suspicion of injury" caused by abuse and neglect to trigger mandatory reporting.

The Attorney General then declared its all harmful, and wants any distincition wrttten in law to be ignored and instead wants his personal opinion enforced as law.

Then Sedgwick County District Attorney agrres with the arbitary principle, but has a different personal opinion on what is covered.

Rule by the personal whim of the State Offical, instead of Rule of Law

34 posted on 02/10/2006 7:27:44 AM PST by Oztrich Boy (Free Speech is not for everyone, If you don't like it, then don't use it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Oztrich Boy
Sad to say that the Tenth Circuit overruled Martens injunction against Kline and in so doing made it clear that the Kansas law has a rational basis.

Sad day for you and your fellow activists, eh?

39 posted on 02/10/2006 7:30:39 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Oztrich Boy; MineralMan

I stand corrected, having read the article too quickly.

You are both right. Thanks for the nudge.


42 posted on 02/10/2006 7:31:05 AM PST by wouldntbprudent (If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson