It's not the judge who is doing the rejecting
At issue in the Kansas case is what the Legislature meant when it wrote the statute to say that doctors and others must have a "suspicion of injury" caused by abuse and neglect to trigger mandatory reporting.
The Attorney General then declared its all harmful, and wants any distincition wrttten in law to be ignored and instead wants his personal opinion enforced as law.
Then Sedgwick County District Attorney agrres with the arbitary principle, but has a different personal opinion on what is covered.
Rule by the personal whim of the State Offical, instead of Rule of Law
Sad day for you and your fellow activists, eh?
I stand corrected, having read the article too quickly.
You are both right. Thanks for the nudge.