To: headstamp
My understanding was that that act barred strict liability claims. I assume that this is a case for manufacturer's negligence.
To: rightwinggoth
Right you are. But, if you remember back during the fight to pass it, the anti's screamed that it would be impossible to sue a gun company if it passed.
As can be seen here, defective product can in fact be subject to litigation contrary to the anti's propaganda.
This does look like defective product or perhaps incorrect ammunition being used.
Regards
154 posted on
02/09/2006 8:45:53 AM PST by
headstamp
(Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson