Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: headstamp

My understanding was that that act barred strict liability claims. I assume that this is a case for manufacturer's negligence.


10 posted on 02/08/2006 9:50:50 PM PST by rightwinggoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: rightwinggoth
Right you are. But, if you remember back during the fight to pass it, the anti's screamed that it would be impossible to sue a gun company if it passed.

As can be seen here, defective product can in fact be subject to litigation contrary to the anti's propaganda.

This does look like defective product or perhaps incorrect ammunition being used.

Regards
154 posted on 02/09/2006 8:45:53 AM PST by headstamp (Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson