Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: george76

One has to think about what service the city provided in order to receive the income (tax). I don't know of one, but perhaps there is one. Usually, rational people think of taxing for a service (e.g. city builds the roads and taxpayer pays for them).

Interestingly, there is a requirement in Texas that the city not be able to recover more than the cost of the service. In other words, they can't provide a dumpster on your property for $600/month, if they can only rationalize a cost to them of $100/month. That would be a new tax, which can only be voted on.


23 posted on 02/08/2006 9:43:27 AM PST by cowtowney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cowtowney

But this is DUmmie land...Chicago.

They can rationalize any tax number for what the Rats think that they deserve of your money.


24 posted on 02/08/2006 9:48:34 AM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson