Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
However, there also is a KEY difference between Clinton and Bush. Clinton demonstratably abused the process for political purposes - the FBI files being exhibit A. I have never seen any evidence of the Bush Admin doing such. Clinton poisoned the well early in his term regarding trusting him with such powers. Bush hasn't.

You're right, but the Constitution doesn't allow you to selectively enforce it. That's why our nation has survived this long. The rules apply to everyone.

26 posted on 02/07/2006 8:45:36 AM PST by NoCountyIncomeTax (http://DonnyFerguson.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: NoCountyIncomeTax
You're right, but the Constitution doesn't allow you to selectively enforce it

Court decisions to date have tended to side with Bush's position here - that intelligence is an executive function and the Legislative has limited power to intrude on that function.

The key recourse for the Legislative would be to impeach and remove a president who abused these powers for political purposes - they have little say in regulating the use of the powers.

Clinton should have been impeached and removed for the FBI Files.

I have seen nothing, however, that shows Bush has abused his powers.

28 posted on 02/07/2006 8:49:35 AM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson