I get to decide for myself.
In the United States, individuals do not have to have a state or "consensus" to define what they prefer or want or understand.
I vote accordingly. Communism, that is the bad influence of so many from Mexico and South and Central America, has so indoctrinated so many people culturally from those regions, that, just as you are alleging in your own counter here, that no individual "gets to" define whatever.
Yes, I "get to define" what and how I reason whatever. To my read, the Fourteenth Amendment HISTORICALLY AND ACADEMICALLY was not created to provide "anchor baby" privilege for citizenship and in fact, suggests that something of that plan was rejectable and to be denied citizenship.
It has only been reinterpreted in contemporary times and it's an affront to the sinceritiy of the Amendment itself. Many American individuals, including me, reason just that way.
It's my decision, my determination, as to my opinion about this and that's how I'll be working and voting accordingly and that is to see that the Fourteenth Amendment is applied sincerely as it was written and that does NOT include the more contemporary misapplication of "anchor baby" privilege of citizenship.
If you feel differntly, as you appear to, then vote accordingly. But in the United States as a republic, we individuals are free to decide these things for ourselves and work toward improving our representational government by individual vote accordingly.
I think we can boil everything down to this line from your post. Indeed, you vote your way and I'll vote mine, and one of our views will prevail. You seem to think it will be your view, and I disagree. We're at the point where all there is left to do is wait and see.