Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fudd Fan
Then why in the name of Elvis is she on the JUDICIARY Committee? aarrgghh

Because she was the only one who could be persuaded (or bought) into taking it.

In the wake of the 1992 "Year of the Woman" election, the Dems felt that they HAD to put a woman on the committee that had handled the Clarence Thomas/Anita Hill mess (which they had leveraged in the 92 election). Problem was, of the Democratic women elected to the Senate that year (DiFi, Boxer, Murray, Mosley-Braun) not a single one actually wanted to sit on Judiciary (since it doesn't give a lot of opportunities to bring pork home to the state).

DiFi apparently cut a sweet deal to agree to go on the committee.
939 posted on 02/06/2006 9:51:21 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 856 | View Replies ]


To: tanknetter; Bahbah

Thanks to both of you. I was under the [mistaken] impression that a senator had to be a lawyer to sit in the Judiciary Committee. Guess I was applying my own standard!


1,531 posted on 02/06/2006 11:56:23 AM PST by Fudd Fan (Sorry Mr. Franklin, but apparently we couldn't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 939 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson