Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Txsleuth
He said that they never MEANT for Bush to be able to wiretap during their permission to go to war?????
WHOA...Specter just drew a major line in the sand.

That's another pitfall in the "AUMF authorizes this" argument. Quite a few Republican Senators have expressed the same sort of "misgiving." Another way this argument is phrased is that "If the President is going to 'misconstrue' or 'extend' Congressional acts, you can bet we'll be circumspect about granting him any authority."

2,415 posted on 02/06/2006 3:03:33 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2373 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

Maybe they will be more careful then, in the future, when writing AUMFs....

so this should go on THEM, not Bush, IMHO.

BUT, it still isn't a political winner...because I think that people with common sense would assume that this kind of surveillance would be part of ANY WAR PLAN.


2,435 posted on 02/06/2006 3:09:01 PM PST by Txsleuth (l drink tea, not kool-aid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2415 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt
you can bet we'll be circumspect about granting him any authority."

Congress doesn't "grant" the president authority, the Constitution does. Congress doesn't have the power to change anything in the Constitution.

2,448 posted on 02/06/2006 3:16:33 PM PST by McGavin999 (If Intelligence Agencies can't find leakers, how can we expect them to find terrorists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2415 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson