Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pukin Dog
Graham is setting up a great argument here for our side. He is establishing the fact that Congress has a remedy at their disposal, if they don't like the NSA program.

Unfortunately he undermined that by suggesting that the President is unrestrained in interpreting the law as he wishes...completely ignoring the fact that the President has been briefing Congress.

1,287 posted on 02/06/2006 11:12:06 AM PST by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1244 | View Replies ]


To: Dolphy

Exactly.

Graham is wrong.


1,295 posted on 02/06/2006 11:14:07 AM PST by Howlin (Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1287 | View Replies ]

To: Dolphy
He is right.

The law says "any and all actions". The president does not have to be an expert on the law to understand "any and all actions". It just points out that Congress is made up of stooges, who wrote the expansive law, because they were afraid to look like wimps in the face of 9-11.
1,296 posted on 02/06/2006 11:14:11 AM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1287 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson