Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIVE THREAD: SJC hearing on the NSA surveilance program - C-span 1; 9:30 am EST

Posted on 02/06/2006 6:08:53 AM PST by ken5050

Good Monday morning, once again, fellow political jinkies. The NFL season may be over, but the political season inside the Beltway is 24/7/365. So join us, if you can, as those wacky Dems on the Senate Judiciary committee reprise their pitiful efforts to once again smear President Bush and score political points..


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; ag; albertogonzales; attorneygeneral; doj; dojprobe; gonzales; nsa; spying; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,101-1,1201,121-1,1401,141-1,160 ... 2,581-2,582 next last
To: Mo1
"The phone companies may be liable at some future date???"

"Kennedy is worried the terrorists will sue them"

I'm way behind and trying to catch up, so I don't know if anyone brought this up, but I could swear I heard that someone is suing the phone company already over this.

The other quick point that I want to bring up, which I'm sure is being discussed in posts I have yet to read is that the AG was very vague when Specter asked questions about how the administration gets along with the FISA court and about Roberts, the judge who resigned. If there WASN"T any problem with the FISA court, it seems to me that Gonzales would have said something along the lines of "Hey, we get along just great." Something is up with the FISA court and its judges and I want to know what it is.

1,121 posted on 02/06/2006 10:34:48 AM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Thanks.


1,122 posted on 02/06/2006 10:34:55 AM PST by Liberty Valance (Who knew Islam's hot button was in the funny papers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1110 | View Replies]

To: acsrp38

Scott's testy today. Not putting up with the reporters' trash.

I like it.


1,123 posted on 02/06/2006 10:35:13 AM PST by Not A Snowbird (Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1116 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

I hope Majority Leader Frist schedules a vote on a "sense of the Senate" resolution calling for the end of the NSA program.




That would be perfect and Frist should do it....let's get them on record...


1,124 posted on 02/06/2006 10:36:19 AM PST by mystery-ak (Army Wife.....toughest job in the military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1119 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Yes, they save the best (or worst) for last.

LOL!


1,125 posted on 02/06/2006 10:36:27 AM PST by conservativebabe ("I came here to chew bubble gum and kick @ss, and I'm all out of bubble gum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1113 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle

"McClellan just "B"-slapped Helen. Really put her in her place!"

What has come over McClellan? He has been firing back at the press these days with some frequency. Good for him. There were some days during the election I so wanted the administration to cut him lose....lol


1,126 posted on 02/06/2006 10:36:48 AM PST by penelopesire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1102 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
Thanks.....

*******************************************

The closing paragraph.....

*********************************

The AUMF is not a blank check for the president to cash at the expense of the rights of citizens. The NSA's terrorist surveillance program is narrowly focused on the international communications of persons believed to be members or agents of al Qaeda or affiliated terrorist organizations. The terrorist surveillance program protects both the security of the nation and the rights and liberties we cherish. As the president said in his State of the Union speech, "the terrorist surveillance program has helped prevent terrorist attacks. It remains essential to the security of America." When I testify before Congress today, I will tell them not only that the president had the authority to use this effective antiterror tool, but that it would have been irresponsible for him not to employ this weapon to prevent another attack on our country.

Mr. Gonzales is the U.S. attorney general.

1,127 posted on 02/06/2006 10:36:50 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1119 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak

OMG! I would pay good money to see that!


1,128 posted on 02/06/2006 10:37:08 AM PST by conservativebabe ("I came here to chew bubble gum and kick @ss, and I'm all out of bubble gum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1124 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
I hope Majority Leader Frist schedules a vote on a "sense of the Senate" resolution calling for the end of the NSA program.

Call their bluff and get them on record

1,129 posted on 02/06/2006 10:37:37 AM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1119 | View Replies]

To: HonestConservative

LOL LOL..it's a 27 inch..hard to move, has to stay left, but I'll stay right :-)


1,130 posted on 02/06/2006 10:38:46 AM PST by hipaatwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1105 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

I have often wondered why U.S. District Judge James Robertson didn't bother to resign until the NYT published that leak.


1,131 posted on 02/06/2006 10:38:57 AM PST by Howlin (Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1121 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

We should start a leak pool.

OK. What do you want to use as the URinaL?
---

www.leakydims.com


1,132 posted on 02/06/2006 10:39:13 AM PST by Christian4Bush (More than 3000 people lost their "civil liberties" on September 11, 2001.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 747 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn
The dems are stuck (mentally) in the Vietnam War and have lost sight of 911

They sure are and they are trying their damnedest to get to Watergate II. This is a "Pre-Impeachment" hearing, no doubt about it.

1,133 posted on 02/06/2006 10:39:18 AM PST by p23185 (Why isn't attempting to take down a sitting Pres & his Admin during wartime considered Sedition?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1074 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Yeah.....
Wouldn't it be great to hear them whining about how unfair it is to actually make them stand up and be counted, AGAIN!!

Imagine the HORROR of Feinstein, Hillary, and Durbin being forced to explain why they voted FOR the program???


1,134 posted on 02/06/2006 10:40:01 AM PST by tcrlaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1129 | View Replies]

To: angkor
... they know that "wiretap" is not legally equal to "trap and trace" and "pen registers", which are quite likely what has been used in the program.

I recall reading that the administration has stated the surveillance was beyond PR/TT level of information.

"What I'm talking about is the intercept of certain communications emanating between somebody inside the United States and outside the United States and one of the numbers would be reasonably suspected to be an Al Qaeda link or affiliate," Bush told an audience at Kansas State University.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,182824,00.html


Atty'y General Gonzales: The President has authorized a program to engage in electronic surveillance of a particular kind, and this would be the intercepts of contents of communications where one of the -- one party to the communication is outside the United States.

http://www.politechbot.com/2005/12/20/transcript-of-briefing/


1,135 posted on 02/06/2006 10:40:02 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1051 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I'm looking forward to her testimony. I thought it was only going to be the AG today.


1,136 posted on 02/06/2006 10:40:06 AM PST by hipaatwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1127 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

I loved how the Republicans kept quoting Sandra Day O'Connor, when discussing the Hamdi case...

Just THREW that opinion back at her FANS on the judiciary committee.


1,137 posted on 02/06/2006 10:40:19 AM PST by Txsleuth (l drink tea, not kool-aid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1129 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

IMO .. that Judge didn't resign in protest

IMO .. he is the Judge that was mentioned in the NYT's article

And if I recall there is an investigation into who leaked the info


1,138 posted on 02/06/2006 10:40:36 AM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1121 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Close hearing scheduled on Feb 9th with AG and Gen Hyden (sp?)

That's too bad; I'd love to see Hayden rip them apart.

And since it's closed, the Dems are free to mischaracterize it till the end of time.

1,139 posted on 02/06/2006 10:40:54 AM PST by Howlin (Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 695 | View Replies]

To: Christian4Bush
Google says:

Sorry, no information is available for the URL www.leakydims.com

1,140 posted on 02/06/2006 10:41:00 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1132 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,101-1,1201,121-1,1401,141-1,160 ... 2,581-2,582 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson