To: billybudd; km6xu
My operating assumption is that what makes this technology useful is that it allows the screening of all calls - not simply from "known" terrorists. We do have to be vigilant about how such information is used in areas outside of the pursuit of terrorists. However, to preemptively impose the burdens of FISA on this operation is simply stupid and unnecessary. Clearly what legislation against wiretaps and electronic surveillance means is that the courts will throw out that evidence and evidence derived from that source - unless it has to do with terrorism. Our Rights can be protected after the fact as well as before the fact. Given the exigencies of a war on terror and having personally witnessed 9/11 - I am for the fullest use of our technical capabilities to counter those who would seek to commit or facilitate or support terrorists and terrorist acts.
11 posted on
02/06/2006 4:58:02 AM PST by
bjc
(Check the data!!)
To: bjc
billybudd & km6xu must be delusional if they think that Gonzalez and GWB want to use 9/11 as an excuse to break the law and violate the rights of US Citizens. Maybe these two and any number of other who feel the way they do should visit the site where two towers used to be. And I am not talking about the Second Book of the "Lord of the Ring" Series.
22 posted on
02/06/2006 8:19:16 AM PST by
wmileo
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson