Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Philadelphia) 'Inquirer' One of Few U.S. Papers to Publish 'Muhammad' Cartoon
Editor and Publisher ^ | 2/5/06 | Joe Strupp

Posted on 02/05/2006 11:22:26 AM PST by LdSentinal

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 02/05/2006 11:22:29 AM PST by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
"Kathleen Carroll, AP executive editor, said the news cooperative has long withheld images it deemed offensive, such as photos and video of beheadings. "We have a very longstanding policy of not distributing material that is found to be offensive," she said, adding that the Inquirer was the only newspaper she knew of that had specifically requested the images from AP. "These images have not met that standard."

But Carroll also agreed with some other editors who said the cartoons did not add to the news coverage in a major way. "If people want to find them, they are easily found," she said.

Oh, reaaaallllyyyy.....I can think of MANY things that "did not add to the news coverage in a major way" which the AP has reported and provided in the past.....rather selective, I'd say.

2 posted on 02/05/2006 11:25:25 AM PST by goodnesswins (Dems..........Stuck on Stupidity proven at the SOTU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

Freaking PC commie cowards.


3 posted on 02/05/2006 11:28:21 AM PST by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

Where is it?


4 posted on 02/05/2006 11:28:44 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
"They wouldn't meet our standards for what we publish in the paper," said Leonard Downie, Jr., executive editor of The Washington Post, which ran a front-page story on the issue Friday, but has not published the cartoons. "We have standards about language, religious sensitivity, racial sensitivity and general good taste."

These guys are just begging to be lexis-nexised and googled with regard to past pictures and cartoons they published concerning Christian religious figures.

5 posted on 02/05/2006 11:31:10 AM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
"(Philadelphia) 'Inquirer' One of Few U.S. Papers to Publish 'Muhammad' Cartoon."

Good!!!

I also wonder if it's a insult to spell Mohammad's name wrong? (Mohammed / Mohamed / Monamad), as I've seen done.

Of course, the real insult would be to corrupt it to something with a Jewish flavour, i.e "Moe Ham Head" :)
6 posted on 02/05/2006 11:33:32 AM PST by George - the Other (400,000 bodies in Saddam's Mass Graves, and counting ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

BLUE RIBBON JOURNALISM AWARD FOR THE PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER


7 posted on 02/05/2006 11:33:52 AM PST by APRPEH (DPP is A OK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

Let's help this left-wing rag. Everybody make sure to e-mail every lunatic muslim "death to America" group and let them know that the Philadelphia Inquirer, located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania is showing these cartoons in hundreds of thousands of it's newspapers. I'm sure these lefties are fearless and won't be intimidated by threats of bombings, arson, and outright death.


8 posted on 02/05/2006 11:39:50 AM PST by Brofholdonow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Religious Press Release Distributor Publishes Controversial Muhammad Cartoon

Click for more Muhammad Political Cartoons

9 posted on 02/05/2006 11:43:09 AM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

I've yet to see it. Anyone know of a link?

I find Bubba's pictures offense, but he's headlining in newspapers every day.


10 posted on 02/05/2006 11:43:18 AM PST by mtbopfuyn (Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George - the Other

Oh great....The NY Times prints our nations secrets, disparages our military, trashes our president but is too chicken to publish those "offending" cartoons re; Muslims.
I shudder to think how close to our highest office that boob Kerry came! He'd kiss Muslim asses just to show how much "we' are misunderstood.


11 posted on 02/05/2006 11:43:50 AM PST by Duffboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
"They wouldn't meet our standards for what we publish in the paper," said Leonard Downie, Jr., executive editor of The Washington Post, which ran a front-page story on the issue Friday, but has not published the cartoons. "We have standards about language, religious sensitivity, racial sensitivity and general good taste."

This from the paper that ran the Toles cartoon with the quadruple amputee.

12 posted on 02/05/2006 11:46:45 AM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

Hey, Amanda Bennett, The Inquirer's editor: watch yer back, lady. CAiR and the "muslim grievance-whores" will be calling, soon.


13 posted on 02/05/2006 11:57:20 AM PST by butternut_squash_bisque (I don't have a clue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

"At USA Today, deputy foreign editor Jim Michaels offered a similar explanation. "At this point, I'm not sure there would be a point to it," he said about publishing the cartoons. "We have described them, but I am not sure running it would advance the story." Although he acknowledged that the cartoons have news value, he said the offensive nature overshadows that."

Anyone ever notice how similar Gannett's logo is to Islam's crescent mooon?

http://www.gannett.com/
http://islam.about.com/library/weekly/aa060401b.htm


14 posted on 02/05/2006 12:00:51 PM PST by abb (Because News Reporting is too important to be left to the Journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

The truth is that the liberal media is scared to death they'd get bombed. That's the simple truth.


15 posted on 02/05/2006 12:10:05 PM PST by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kjo

Yes, they're cowards.


16 posted on 02/05/2006 12:12:07 PM PST by ncpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

American Press = Islam's Bitch


17 posted on 02/05/2006 12:14:36 PM PST by Lexington Green (FOX doctored the news to satisfy a Saudi stockholder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

Fox News showed the cartoons.


18 posted on 02/05/2006 12:18:49 PM PST by ops33 (Retired USAF Senior Master Sergeant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

This is the same mentality behind the notion that we cannot show any images of 9/11 because they are "too disturbing."


19 posted on 02/05/2006 12:22:03 PM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
"They wouldn't meet our standards for what we publish in the paper," said Leonard Downie, Jr., executive editor of The Washington Post

"They'll find out where I live and blow up my house"

"I'd rather not be beheaded this year on video"

20 posted on 02/05/2006 12:23:14 PM PST by MarMema (Buy Danish, support freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson