Souter said it was an appropriate way. Who is this ham-hock to argue with a SCJ?
The people of Weare that attended the town deliberative session did NOT vote for strengthened eminent domain laws. What the group of 93 unguided activists did is violate the US Constitution (art. 14) as well as the NH State Constitution (art. 10).
The activists are asking for the Town of Weare government to grant special protection for an individual by name; David Souter. This is illegal.
I was there and I sat appalled to see the article rewritten and bastardized. This is a violation of a groups right to petition its own government, violating their rights.
Walter Bohlin may think he is a patriot, or a superhero, but he is indisputably a coward in my circle(s). A man afraid of democracy, fearful of the remainder; 4900 registered Weare voters.
“This is not the appropriate way”… Easy words, especially without presenting an effective plan that IS deemed appropriate…
My one year old daughter could have entered the word “Not” in three places.