Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: serendepitylives
For 20 years, every Republican gubernatorial candidate endorsed by the party also became the nominee, although more often than not they were unopposed in the primary.

Wow. what a factoid. Unopposed people endorsed by the party are the nominee. Who'd a thunk it?

The only two point worth considering is that Rendell has raised 12 million to Swann's 1.5 million. However, Swann started raising funds recently, while Rendell has probably been raising funds since the last election. Add to that the fact that Rendell has a bad name now, and Swann is popular, and it becomes a lot more interesting.

17 posted on 02/04/2006 4:45:35 PM PST by Richard Kimball (Look, Daddy! Teacher says every time a Kennedy talks, a Republican gets a house seat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Richard Kimball

Ed Rendell is vulnerable to an African-American conservative. I know it, he knows it, and so should the vast majority of Pennsylvanians.
Who carried Ed to Harrisburg? African-Americans in Philly and Pittsburgh. Lynn Swann can split that vote with appeals to a socially conservative agenda that reflects the values of many African-Americans here.


19 posted on 02/04/2006 4:56:56 PM PST by MCPO Airdale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Richard Kimball
That's a factor that cannot be ignored. While Swann and Scranton have displayed an ability to raise money, with each pulling in more than $1.5 million last year, Rendell raised nearly six times that much. He ended the year with more than $12 million on hand.

Wonder what percentage of that $12 million is Union money?

49 posted on 02/04/2006 9:06:13 PM PST by Shethink13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson