To: Casloy
And rightly so, there is no such thing as freedom of the press when you are occupying your enemy's territory. As the Federal government never recognized the South to have seceeded, would it not follow that the Federal troops were still on Federal territory? By their own definition?
182 posted on
02/05/2006 4:47:27 PM PST by
detsaoT
(Proudly not "dumb as a journalist.")
To: detsaoT
As the Federal government never recognized the South to have seceeded, would it not follow that the Federal troops were still on Federal territory? A civil war is by definition the breakdown of the rule of law. In the middle of a war, in the enemy's territory, the only rule of law that applies is the one determined by whatever General is in command. If you know of exceptions to this, I'd be interested.
188 posted on
02/05/2006 7:13:18 PM PST by
Casloy
To: detsaoT
don't confuse him/her with a RATIONAL argument.
free dixie,sw
213 posted on
02/06/2006 8:05:49 AM PST by
stand watie
(Resistance to tyrants is OBEDIENCE to GOD. Thomas Jefferson, 1804)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson