The boots of the men who arrest those who voice "illegal speech."
What "wow"?
The "Wow, you have no idea what totalitarianism is like . . . you have no sense of history and folks like you would doom us all to repeat it."
The penalty for defiance of censorship in the West has always been a fine, with closing the newspaper a sanction of last resort. No boots.
I have a very good idea of what totalitarianism is like: I grew up in the Soviet Union. I remember sneaking around with typewritten copies of Gulag Archipelago very well. We understood freedom of speech because we knew why it matters. To ridicule the faith, however misplaced, of a religious minority from under the protection of an atheist state is very much akin to what the Soviet propaganda machine was doing; it has zero relevance to freedom of speech. Are you seriously comparing the uber-establishmentarian Le Monde to a dissident publication?
Decency in the public space is what safeguards freedom of speech.