Replies

With specific reference to Mrs. Schiavo, I read the court documents that determined that she would not want to continue her existence under the circumstances she was then in.

We all read the judge's ruling that mischaracterized and misstated the evidence. If what the judge said had been true, that would be entirely different from the facts in this case.

Go back and read the transcript of that hearing. There was no evidence that Terri would have wanted to die under any circumstances. There was no evidence that Terri ever made any reference to a situation she later found herself in. There was ample credible evidence that she was morally opposed to killing or being killed.

I'm sure you're aware of the fact that those who supported Terri's right to live based that support on the actual evidence, and have repeatedly pointed out that certain judges, lawyers, journalists, politicians, and medical professionals have lied. If a judge has been accused of handing down a bad decision and lying in his summation of the facts, you cannot base an accurate opinion solely on the judge's word. If you want to know the truth, you must examine the actual evidence. When you do, and you see that the summation of the judge conflicts with the evidence, you can no longer accept his lies as proof that he told the truth.

You claim to have read the available documents, and if you really did, then you know Terri was murdered. There is no other conclusion that can be drawn from the available facts.