Of course, in her state, she was unable to experience desires of any kind save the most primitive, brainstem sort. Of course, that is just your opinion and I presume the SPT's formed that opinion for you. Correct? Also, as long as you read all of the court records too, why didn't Michael have to file his guardianship reports? That should get us started.
ME: Of course, in her state, she was unable to experience desires of any kind save the most primitive, brainstem sort.
YOU: Of course, that is just your opinion and I presume the SPT's formed that opinion for you. Correct?
Hello again, everyone; I'm back from my appointment, and will try to continue our discussion for as long as I can. 8)
OK; no, it wasn't the SPT that formed the basis for my assertion above. The reports on Mrs. Schiavo's CT scans, the GAL report, later the autopsy report--I don't remember what all now, but all the medical evidence showing that virtually the only part of her brain that remained functional was the brainstem--all of this made plain the fact that the poor woman had no cognitive abilities left.
Also, as long as you read all of the court records too, why didn't Michael have to file his guardianship reports? That should get us started.
I read all the court documents I could
get hold of. I don't know if that was everything or not. I don't remember anything about guardianship reports in the material I did read, so I'm afraid I am unable to answer your question. But thanks for taking the time to post!