Anyone dare to guess which side the following are on regarding State Sponsored Bioethicking? CPUSA? DSA? MoveOn.org? Democrat party leadership?
World Socialist Website
North provides an overview of the case, which became a cause célèbre for extreme right-wing forces, including the Bush administration, and a focus for their efforts to undermine science and democratic secularism.
World Socialist Web Site Review:
If anyone wants to research it further, please do. I don't want to ruin my breakfast.
8mm
If I considered cheering for the killing of innocents such as Terri and Haleigh, I would wonder why all these communists, socialists, and enemies of our country agree with me so much and count me amongst their friends.
A dangerous abuse of power to save a disabled woman's life with many unanswered questions surrounding her condition (before her starvation death)? What about the ACLU's mission statement "The ACLU is our nation's guardian of liberty, working daily in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States"?
Perhaps in the case of Terri and others, we should modify the ACLU's statement by also adding the term "non-disabled" between the words "every person" to make it accurate.
The ACLU's love affair with death
8mm
I took a peek. I do not recommend that anyone risk it :-) The WSWS is a classic exercise in robotics, aka party line thinking. All facts, information, thought and emotion must be ideologized and forced to conform to the party line. Death to dissent! Death to human intelligence! You'd think a century of "progressive" extermination camps and gulags and genocidal murders would have raised a few doubts, but no, they revel in it and want more of it.
bump for later