[AndrewC]

Then maybe Dr. Stephen C. Meyer ought to update his bio on the Access Research Network.

He might or someone at ARN should, but does not make the article correct. BTW here is the text from the who is page for Meyer from ARN

Meet Stephen C. Meyer Ph. D., History and Philosophy of Science, Cambridge University, 1990. Steve is an associate editor of Origins & Design magazine, and an Associate Professor of Philosophy at Whitworth College. He is a Senior Research Fellow of the Discovery Institute in Seattle. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Previous Page ] [ Return to About ARN page ] [ ARN home page ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4.8.97

Notice the 4.8.97?

... detailed rigorous accounts of how intelligent design of any biological system occurred, is that correct?
...supportive of intelligent design,

Notice a difference of degree?

This is what the judge states

The evidence presented in this case demonstrates that ID is not supported by any peer-reviewed research, data or publications.

Check out the Discovery link. http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2640 . You can judge for yourself whether the publications are in a peer-reviewed publication.

True enough. It was at SMU

Nope still wrong. Wedge does not equal ID.

As for 1995 and your papers comment, similar to Wedge <> ID, Discovery <> ID.

[dread78645]

> ... detailed rigorous accounts of how intelligent design of any biological system occurred, is that correct?
...supportive of intelligent design,

Notice a difference of degree?

Yes. The ID folks expect to that their spin should be considered science without data to back it up. But science, however, wants 'detailed rigorous' data.
How do you expect to get past peer-review without that data?

Check out the Discovery link. http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2640 . You can judge for yourself whether the publications are in a peer-reviewed publication.

I did.

• Meyer's "The Origin of Biological Information and the Higher Taxonomic Categories" -Biological Society of Washington
  Rejected after publication by the society due to irregular review actions by editor Sternberg.
• Lönnig's "Dynamic genomes, morphological stasis and the origin of irreducible complexity, Dynamical Genetics"
  'Research Signpost' of Kerala, India is hardly a peer-reviewed publication.
  Says zip about design. As for Dr. Lönnig, he argues against the 'insensibly fine steps' of Darwin and the apparent stasis of the fossil record; I don't suppose he ever read Gould.
• Wells, "Do Centrioles Generate a Polar Ejection Force?" - Rivista di Biologia
  Lovely. Italian paraphyscology and biology in the same magazine.
• Minnich and Meyer, "Genetic Analysis of Coordinate Flagellar and Type III Regulatory Circuits"
  Conference paper -- No review. Anyhow, they (probably) Minnich give a sensible overview of the TTSS and flagella structures in regards to bubonic plague research. Then they (probably Meyer) proceed to make a hash of it and present a series of 'Philosophical implications' that's unrelated to (and sometimes contradicts) the research that they just gave.
• Behe [and Snoke] "Simulating Evolution by Gene Duplication of Protein Features That Require Multiple Amino Acid Residues" - Protein Science
  Says nothing about design.
• Lönnig & Saedler, "Chromosome Rearrangements and Transposable Elements" - Annual Review of Genetics
  A recap of chromosome research. No mention of design.
• Chiu and Lui "Integrated Use of Multiple Interdependent Patterns for Biomolecular Sequence Analysis" - International Journal of Fuzzy Systems.
  Devoted to modeling approximate data in computer systems. The authors mention complex specified information as an aside, but move on to describe useful methods of pattern analysis.

Nope still wrong. Wedge does not equal ID.

Which would be correct.

ID is a subset of the Wedge initiative. Which is why Johnson met with Behe, Meyers and Dembski at SMU and included it into the document's 'Five year strategic plan summary' :

"Design theory promises to reverse the stifling dominance of the materialist worldview, and to replace it with a science consonant with Christian and theistic convictions."