To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
2 posted on
02/01/2006 6:33:40 AM PST by
PatrickHenry
(Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
To: PatrickHenry
Could you please explain to me just one theory of evolution that is not in dispute and has been totally proven? I am neither pro nor anti-evolution. I just can not find it within my better judgment to put my faith for truth in evolution because I can not find a consistent set of facts that actually lead to a definitive conclusion and I have no idea what intelligent design can prove other than you can not from disorder achieve order. Evolution claims the exact opposite. That right their blows evolution away for me.
I believe evolution on a macro level exists. The proof is everywhere. But as for micro-evolution, I am sorry, either their is something wrong with me or something wrong this theory. I consider myself fine. P.S. I'm still trying to digest the whole "atoms never being seen" thingy. But thats just me!!
7 posted on
02/01/2006 7:25:13 AM PST by
coffee260
(coffee(I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN WELDON!))
To: PatrickHenry
To: PatrickHenry
Jones decision in the dover case is not binding for any parties other than the ones directly involved in that case. Jones' opinion has absolutely no relevance to any future case; even within the same district.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson