[plain talk]

You can read my earlier posts to see the obvious solution to spam posting. No need to repeat it again for the 3rd or 4th time.

[Dimensio]

Your "solution" has been tried before. We can show you postings from FR creationists who stated that they would not read links, because they wanted the facts presented right here.

[whattajoke]

RE: your "links solution" to perceived spam:

You must not have hung around these threads for long. If you had, you'd be all too aware that many other creationists have complained that lists of links are also spam and that they are "annoying." So which is it? You guys need to figure it out.

What you're not understanding is that you may have what you think is a simple little talking point you gleaned from some creationist pamphlet. So you post it here. Then someone, let's say Ichneumon, rebuts your claim with mountains of relevant and factual evidence. And you get pissed.

Well, waaahhh-waaahh-wah. That's the problem with you people. You're much more comfortable with a simple, "God did it," or "the flagellum is designed" type of soundbite answer rather than the cold hard facts.

This new tactic against Ich is so pitiful, so embarrassing, and so disingenuous, I can't believe sentient adults are making it. did you cry to your professors for making you read more than the captions?