To: Right Wing Professor
(but then, you were predicting Dover would win, in the face of massive evidence to the contrary, all the way through the trial.) I did not predict that the school district would win; and specifically stated that, based on my experience with courts, one cannot predict how a judge would rule on any case or that the judge would even follow the law.
To: connectthedots
You made several
"educated guesses".
You also predicted that it would be a
"narrow ruling", which is hardly what happened. You claimed "While some of the board members had a religious motive for mentioning ID in the 'statement', the final 'statement' does not constitute a breaching of a separation of church and state." and that "While some of the board members had a religious motive for mentioning ID in the 'statement', the final 'statement' does not constitute a breaching of a separation of church and state." (which appeared to be in the context of a prediction regarding the verdict).
Oh, wait,
you DID say that "I think the judge will rule very narrowly in favor of the defendants".
Nevermind...
137 posted on
02/01/2006 3:53:38 PM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: connectthedots
I did not predict that the school district would win... I seem to recall you predicted Behe would shine on the witness stand, or kick butt, or something else good for ID.
164 posted on
02/01/2006 4:23:32 PM PST by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson