To: Mo1; Bahbah; OXENinFLA; tiredoflaundry; Howlin; Peach; ken5050; defconw; MNJohnnie; Carolinamom; ...
To: Txsleuth
I'm not happy with that one.
470 posted on
02/16/2006 1:25:28 PM PST by
Howlin
("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
To: Txsleuth
The "sale of port security" has already been rebutted. Nothing to see ... move along.
My understanding is that these companies are the freight handlers, who don't have security as their primary responsibility. They are more like the "port equivalent" of UPS and FedEx. They handle the freight, and submit as required to customs and other agents of the law.
471 posted on
02/16/2006 1:26:13 PM PST by
Cboldt
To: Txsleuth
The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, run by the Treasury Department, reviewed an assessment from U.S. intelligence agencies. The committee's 12 members agreed unanimously the sale did not present any problems, the department said Who are the 12 members?
472 posted on
02/16/2006 1:34:21 PM PST by
Mo1
(Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
To: Txsleuth
Are you watching the president on FNC? It's a tape and he's asked about Cheney and although he's remaining calm and dignified, it is OBVIOUS that he is ticked off.
Re the ports, Txsleuth, I'm not happy that Arabs will be put in charge of some port security.
473 posted on
02/16/2006 1:38:59 PM PST by
Peach
(Hillary ran over a cop and didn't even stop.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson