Actually, freedom of speech isn't absolute. There are times when government restricts speech. Libel suits are an example. I believe there are compelling reasons why demonstrations shouldn't be allowed in the House chamber - particularly during an event like the State of the Union Address.
"Actually, freedom of speech isn't absolute. There are times when government restricts speech. Libel suits are an example. I believe there are compelling reasons why demonstrations shouldn't be allowed in the House chamber - particularly during an event like the State of the Union Address."
There are, but the difference between when state governments may and when the federal government may are substantial. I believe there are reasons why demonstrations shouldn't be allowed in the House chamber, too, but I don't think that wearing a t-shirt really constitutes conduct disruptive of the chamber's work, do you? I'd prefer freedom of speech to government repression of it any day, the Constitution agrees with me even if the courts do not, and this tap on the shoulder for wearing a t-shirt with a message qualifies.
Now, I do think that the House could have imposed rules that impose a gallery dress code, or interrupting the speaker, but I also think that the chamber should be entirely bulletproof-glassed in, sealed off from interruption...
...and then, since it's Congress, filled with water.