Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Mojo
Okay, she's not against it in all cases. I think that's the current GOP platform, isn't it? Rape, incest, life of the mother?

I know there's a faction that thinks that any exception makes one "pro-abortion".

54 posted on 01/31/2006 5:39:26 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone
I wouldn't call it a 'faction.' I'd call it the entire philosophical underpinning of the pro-life movement.

The entire basis for the anti-abortion movement is the idea (with which I disagree, for both spiritual and scientific reasons) that 'life begins at conception' and therefore an abortion is 'murder.' Exceptions for rape or incest are tantamount to legitimizing murder of persons conceived in this way. What's 'pro-life' about that?

There really isn't any way to reconcile these things. Either killing ANY embryo or fetus is murder, or it isn't. Since I don't believe that 'life begins at conception' (an aside, in case anyone asks - the primary reason I don't believe this is that bazillions of 'conceived' embryos never implant and become full blown pregnancies, and I have a hard time believing that all of those conceptions that we never even knew about are dead persons invested with souls), I can't accept the 'murder' rationale for all abortions. If I did, however, I simply cannot see how one can argue for 'exceptions' based upon the manner of conception.

120 posted on 02/01/2006 8:35:51 AM PST by lugsoul ("Try not to be sad." - Laura Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson