[jla]

I have to say that I find Schlafly's column quite ill-timed.

As a "citizen reporter" you surely must be aware that Mrs. S probably wrote this well before it was published on her website?
Not that I would doubt that the inimitable, irrepressible, First Lady of Conservatism would've held it back even if she had written it only this morning.

God bless Phyllis Schlafy, for she proves that the Left does not have a monopoly on ill-behaved, shrewish, unfeminine women...nor Milquetoast men.

[Howlin]

As a "citizen reporter" you surely must be aware that Mrs. S probably wrote this well before it was published on her website?

Oh sure.......she wrote it a long time ago -- and it takes what, FIVE SECONDS to upload it?

Bogus.

[A Citizen Reporter]

It was web-published on 30 January 2006. If she isn't happy with the timing of the publication, I would think she'd have something to say about it.

Frankly, it doesn't matter if she wrote it two weeks ago. I thought that Schlafly was a pro-life champion, so I find this article being written on the eve of the nomination of Samuel Alito by President George W. Bush to be disastrous.

Again I say, I think that Phyllis is pushing more people away, than those she accuses. I, for one, won't pay her a bit of attention anymore.