To: maggief
When the Hawaii senator was ill and couldn't make the vote on a judge, Senator Stevens voted yes, but then changed to "abstain", to balance out the vote. This is what a collegial body does.
On a cloture vote, the "nays" are meaningless, all that matters is how many "aye" votes there are. For a brief moment, when Senator Reid stood up to announce Ensign was injured and couldn't make the vote, I thought Reid was going to announce that, in honor of the senate collegiality and common decency, he would vote "yes" on clotuer for his fellow Nevadan since Ensign's "abstain" vote would be like a "no" vote.
But then, he didn't, because democrats, and Reid in particular, have no honor, no propriety, and no sense of decency or collegiality.
To: CharlesWayneCT
When the Hawaii senator was ill and couldn't make the vote on a judge, Senator Stevens voted yes, but then changed to "abstain", to balance out the vote. This is what a collegial body does.
On a cloture vote, the "nays" are meaningless, all that matters is how many "aye" votes there are. For a brief moment, when Senator Reid stood up to announce Ensign was injured and couldn't make the vote, I thought Reid was going to announce that, in honor of the senate collegiality and common decency, he would vote "yes" on clotuer for his fellow Nevadan since Ensign's "abstain" vote would be like a "no" vote.
But then, he didn't, because democrats, and Reid in particular, have no honor, no propriety, and no sense of decency or collegiality.
--
Bump
634 posted on
01/31/2006 7:51:34 AM PST by
maggief
(and the dessert cart rolls on ...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson