Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wurlitzer

FWIW, a far more detailed article at the link below seems to indicate that a new charge of contempt of court was not issued and the original sentences were only revised.

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060127/NEWS03/601270321/1005

The girls were idiots for going to court without a lawyer and thinking that just crying for the judge would smooth things over.


82 posted on 01/31/2006 7:04:27 AM PST by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: JeffAtlanta
Thanks for posting the full article, which, assuming it is true and complete, certainly makes it appear that these girls ran into a judge who got his feelings hurt and wanted to make an example. It's one thing to be a "hangin' judge" for murder and rape, but for an 18-year-old blowing a .02?

The girls were idiots for going to court without a lawyer and thinking that just crying for the judge would smooth things over.

It sounded like only the first girl tried to do that. Of course, without a lawyer, the judge could easily give her all the rope she needed to hang herself and her friends too. Naturally, she got the heaviest sentence. The others appeared with lawyers, but probably on the basis of the blubbery admissions of the first one, the best they could do was less jail time.

Drinking before prom? Dumb.
Posting identifying information on the Internet? Dumber.
An 18-year-old trying to represent herself in criminal court? Dumbest. And she took her friends down with her.
89 posted on 01/31/2006 7:21:12 AM PST by Turbopilot (Nothing in the above post is or should be construed as legal research, analysis, or advice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson