[Dimensio]

A FIVE-YEAR-OLD can look at a watch and tell you it didn't come together by shaking a bunch of watch parts in a bag.

A FIVE-YEAR-OLD can look at a sand castle and tell you it wasn't created simply by the action of waves and sand.

A FIVE-YEAR-OLD can look at a log cabin and tell you it wasn't made by a bunch of logs randomly falling in a forest.

None of the objects that you have listed are imperfect replicators. You are employing an invalid analogy.

And a FIVE-YEAR-OLD can certainly look at himself/herself and know that he/she doesn't have a monkey for an uncle.

Strawman.

Do you have an honest argument to make, one rooted in fact and/or rationality?

[GLDNGUN]

None of the objects that you have listed are imperfect replicators. You are employing an invalid analogy.

And how the very first "imperfect replicator" come into existence?