Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: miele man
Are there any old Navy salts who can suggest why these pilots could not land on the carrier?

Sounds like the crash happened during a recovery cycle. Once the plane went down the carrier would have immediately changed course and slowed to assist in the recovery of the pilot, possibly even launching additional helicopters or the ship's boats. This would have prevented the other five planes from landing. Had the ship been operating out of range of a dirvert field then the five others would have been recovered onboard but, since there was a divert option they sent all of the airborne aircraft there and went immediately into search mode.

It is also possible, but not stated in the article, that the plane crashed after attempting a landing, possibly dropping parts of itself onto the flight deck and creating a danger to any other planes trying to land. That would also have created the need to divert the airborne aircraft to shore.

41 posted on 01/30/2006 1:32:58 AM PST by Squint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Squint

shouldnt all that be a part of the training? I mean, for them to be ingaged in combat and suddenly stop everything to rescue one plane, wouldnt that interupt combat missions that are very important? I'm not very well educated on carrier landing and missions or military operations, just an inquiring mind.


50 posted on 01/30/2006 7:24:49 AM PST by groovejedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson