I am simply making an observation here in that there is not one word of disagreement about Mississippi paying their citizens $150,000 simply because Barbour is a republican with connections. What is the difference in Mississippi paying well over market value for the homes that were destroyed than Louisiana doing the same thing? They are using federal dollars to buy out the flooded homeowners who did not have flood insurance.
I doubt you'll get an answer to that. Everything Mississippi does is right and everything Louisiana does is wrong.
I searched for information on Federal Government Aid to Mississippi's Gulf Coast residents and could not find any hard and fast figures. Do you have a link to the $150,000.00 figure?. I really wanted to see if there was a disparity in the amounts to New Orleans vs Mississippi.