First of all, Target would make a lot more money selling tobacco and firearms than they would ever make selling these pills. But they refuse to sell these to appease some group or another.
What about this, if a private hospital required it's staff physicians to perform abortions, something that they had never done before, would you support them?
I'm not saying that what Target did was necessarily illegal, I'm saying it was wrong. And I'm saying that for that reason, pro-life consumers should hold them responsible. They backed down on "banning" Christmas, why not force them to back down on this?
If that was a requirement for a private hospital, yes I would. I would disagree with it, I wouldn't go to that hospital but I respect private property and the right of the owner of that private property to operate their business (as long as it's not illegal) as they see fit.
I'm not saying that what Target did was necessarily illegal, I'm saying it was wrong. And I'm saying that for that reason, pro-life consumers should hold them responsible
And in a free market, that is a fully acceptable practice. However this woman does not have a court case