Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC
I didn't present them as being one step away from a histone, did I? No, of course not, but obviously you're not going to let that stop you from inventing the claim for me.

No, I'm done here - my assessment was entirely correct. You do not enter the discussion in good faith. I doubt you are capable of discussing the issue in good faith, based on your record of repeated and deliberate distortion here.

340 posted on 01/30/2006 6:04:22 PM PST by Senator Bedfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies ]


To: Senator Bedfellow
I didn't present them as being one step away from a histone, did I? No, of course not, but obviously you're not going to let that stop you from inventing the claim for me.

This is your statement....homologs such as the protamines may well have served some entirely different function before doing what histones do now. A minor change to that homolog, and presto - histones

"A" is singular. Now protamines and protamine analogs are only relevant to this discussion in light of your fiction. Thus they are mentioned by you as a possible candidate homolog. If not, then you deserve to have your red herring flushed down the toilet.

And I am now almost certain that you can't provide the sequences of the synthetics.

341 posted on 01/30/2006 6:12:31 PM PST by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson