Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Senator Bedfellow
You're not seriously arguing that the protamines we see today are the only possible protamines, are you?

Yeah, protamines are protamines. If they are not protamines they are something else. Unless you plan on falling on the Something changed into something else a billion and a half years ago. They were quite unlike the protamines and histones of today argument.

318 posted on 01/30/2006 4:56:42 PM PST by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]


To: AndrewC

Allow me to be the first, apparently, to disabuse you of this notion that you've somehow internalized, that protamines are somehow defined from a list of compounds X, Y, and Z, and things not X, Y, or Z are therefore not protamines. It doesn't work that way, despite how convenient such a definition might be for your purposes here.


320 posted on 01/30/2006 5:04:17 PM PST by Senator Bedfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson