To: Senator Bedfellow; AndrewC; Torie
Read
this, tell me if you think histones are a problem for NDT.
To: jwalsh07
Not really, no. Hoyle makes the usual mistake of assuming that you've either got a fully-functioning histone, or you have garbage. But of course, there's no demand on the theory of evolution that says that whatever a structure is doing now, that's what it's always done - one of the primary mechanisms of evolution we see are old things being co-opted into new functions. So it's not necessarily the case that histones had to evolve stepwise into this one and only function, all while being completely nonfunctional until they reached that magic end result - homologs such as the protamines may well have served some entirely different function before doing what histones do now. A minor change to that homolog, and presto - histones.
To: jwalsh07
From that website:
"The Darwinian theory is wrong and the continued adherence to it is an impediment to discovering the correct evolutionary theory" -- Fred Hoyle
Darwin's Natural Selection theory is a total clusterf* of science. To nub of it, as History now clearly shows, is its root in denial of G-d. In order to acheive that atheistic objective, Darwin ruined science for over a hundred years now.
Hoyle didn't help, I think, no matter how late in October his lament was cobbled together, for Hoyle threw up his own distracting munitions -- panspermia! His own flying spagetti monster in the form of a sentient gas cloud.
193 posted on
01/29/2006 7:57:38 AM PST by
bvw
To: jwalsh07
It looks like the answer you got from your other addressee makes Darwinism unfalsifiable.
203 posted on
01/29/2006 1:06:52 PM PST by
AndrewC
(Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson