Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brilliant

I don't believe he needs to prove it can do anything useful although that would be great. As a scientist he's not necessarily interested in the end product. He's more interested in seeing if there's a new undiscovered nuclear process here. That alone would rewrite the science books and probably win him a Nobel.


18 posted on 01/25/2006 5:56:09 AM PST by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: saganite

Well, that may be true, but I'm just saying that proving it with experiments that are so subtle that you've got to rely on statistical measurements is not going to convince a lot of scientists. If he produces large amounts of usable energy, that's kind of hard to argue against.

On the other hand, there are plenty of bizarro conclusions that scientists have drawn from statistical studies in other contexts. A good example is quantum entanglement. And that is largely accepted by the scientific community, so it might be possible for him to gain acceptance of the theory without producing usable energy if others can duplicate it.


20 posted on 01/25/2006 6:05:20 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson