To: RunningWolf; TheBrotherhood
The truth is no one will know on this issue.
That is the most charitable reading one can give of Lady Hope's story, which is (as Answers in Genesis admits) contains "factual inaccuracies."
It's also not what TheBrotherhood posted. If he had said that "no one will know," that could have been defensible.
But TheBrotherhood said that Darwin's deathbed recantation was "historical fact." He repeated that phrase several times.
Which, even by the most charitable reading of Lady Hope's story, is a lie.
729 posted on
01/27/2006 11:53:03 AM PST by
highball
("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
To: highball
Look forget about what AIG says. Or is that the one thing AIG says that you agree with, is that it?
Since no one knows for sure except Darwin and maybe Lady Hope, it is equally "historical fact" whether this happened or not, it all depends who's word you want to take.
Now what you consider to be defensible or charitable is irrelevant the historical factualness of Darwin's recantation, and addressing that would be a waste of my time anyway so I wont even get into that.
Wolf
733 posted on
01/27/2006 1:48:01 PM PST by
RunningWolf
(Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson