[RunningWolf]

Please explain how cavalierly you just declared Lady Hope a liar at the start of this with Brotherhood.

You declare it of course, but that makes it no more true than most of your other declarations.

TheBrotherhood, this seems to be a core tenet of evo logic. They begin on the basis you are a liar. I say they lie in their accusations.

Wolf

[TheBrotherhood]

>TheBrotherhood, this seems to be a core tenet of evo logic. They begin on the basis you are a liar. I say they lie in their accusations.

I will not stain myself to their lying and personal attacks by reciprocating and hurling ad hominem attacks at them. It's not in my vein to do so, despite their calling me lier and other pejorative terms.

[highball]

TheBrotherhood, this seems to be a core tenet of evo logic. They begin on the basis you are a liar. I say they lie in their accusations.

You could, but there would be no truth in it. TheBrotherhood has been trapped in his lies.

He asserted known falsehoods as "historical facts." When caught, he posted links from a creationist website proving that the "historical facts" were lies, but edited the quotes to make it appear as though they were supporting his contention.

Hint: when even Answers in Genesis tells you that you shouldn't use a particular argument against evolution because it's not true, you really ought not use that argument.

Any honest creationist would have to decry these transparent falsehoods. That no creationist has done so, and now one rises to his defense, tells us much about the honesty of the movement as a whole.