Water under the bridge.
I already responded to most pertinent and relevant questions. I dont want to say I responded to all posts addressed to me because if a poster digressed in his/her post to me, I did not feel it opportune to me to answer it. I like to keep things in focus and on target.
You mean like how you keep asserting that you're right and supporting this contention by posting links to (and then misquoting) articles that disagree with you?
"I already responded to most pertinent and relevant questions."
Then please explain how Lady Hope could have been with Darwin on his deathbed when the time that ALL accounts give as the only time she would have met with him was in October 1881, months before he became ill? And why does Lady Hope NOT say that he was on his death bed in any of her accounts yet YOU claim she was? And why did you at first say that Darwin's children supported the claim then run away from that claim? How can you possibly claim you have answered anything?
In other words, if someone points out that you're a liar, you simply ignore them rather than coming up with a response.