While he didn't state it explicitly, I was taking his comment to refer to frauds supposedly done to support evolution. I admit now that I should not have made this assumption, as there was no wording to either state or even imply such an exclusive range... dimensio post #682
Interesting that you (dimensio)should have automatically assumed that he (zeeba) was referring to frauds done to support evolution when he didn't state that. So then, if these aritcles are dealing with fraud in the life sciences, of which evolution is a part, then you either think that evolutionists are exempt from the human foibles that afflict the rest of humanity, or that you do not consider evolutionists to be scientists, so it then wouldn't apply to them. I don't believe the first; and as for the the second......
Hi metmom!
I just read your email but did not respond.
I take this opportunity to thank you for the missive and for the comments in them; I agree 100%.
Once again, thanks.