Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bondserv
...a non-Galilean reality...

That's a new one! I'll have to remember that!

But seriously, my post was about the lack of evidence. Your response has not provided any evidence, nor even hinted at there being any.

If you want to do science, forget the "mind control," "elitists within Liberal Academia," "oppression you folks are pandering," and "attempting to censure any opposing theory" paranoia and bring on the evidence.

Its that simple. Either you have some evidence, or you do not. Either what you are doing is science, or it is belief.

But talking about mind control, elitists, oppression, censorship and other gibberish is not conducive to a good scientific discussion. Try the psych department.

671 posted on 01/25/2006 10:02:04 PM PST by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 670 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman
Either you have some evidence, or you do not. Either what you are doing is science, or it is belief.

That was the exact point of my original post that you commented on. We are seeing more and more credentialed scientists weigh in in favor of Intelligent Design, which means more scientific eyes taking the topic seriously.

672 posted on 01/25/2006 10:22:00 PM PST by bondserv (God governs our universe and has seen fit to offer us a pardon. †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 671 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman
Either you have some evidence, or you do not.

EVIDENCE FOR ID????

WHAT EVIDENCE:

On cross-examination, Professor Behe admitted that: "There are no peer reviewed articles by anyone advocating for intelligent design supported by pertinent experiments or calculations which provide detailed rigorous accounts of how intelligent design of any biological system occurred"(22:22-23 (Behe)). Additionally, Professor Behe conceded that there are no peer-reviewed papers supporting his claims that complex molecular systems, like the bacterial flagellum, the blood-clotting cascade, and the immune system, were intelligently designed. (21:61-62 (complex molecular systems), 23:4-5 (immune system), and 22:124-25 (blood-clotting cascade) (Behe)). In that regard, there are no peer-reviewed articles supporting Professor Behe's argument that certain complex molecular structures are "irreducibly complex."17 (21:62, 22:124-25 (Behe)). In addition to failing to produce papers in peer-reviewed journals, ID also features no scientific research or testing. (28:114-15 (Fuller); 18:22-23, 105-06 (Behe))
p 89 of the Dover Judgement [emphasis added to help the addled, the confused, and the victims of anti-Evo mendacity]
685 posted on 01/26/2006 10:23:24 AM PST by longshadow (FReeper #405, entering his ninth year of ignoring nitwits, nutcases, and recycled newbies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 671 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson