[VadeRetro]

So TheBrotherhood raising this possibility does not make him a liar no matter how many some of the nutballs on your side scream it out, and no matter how many atheist evo web sites they link up too.

He didn't raise it as a possibility, he raised it as a historical fact. That would mean he had evidence that it did happen, not that there's a time window in which it could have.

Roosevelt could have secretly visited Hitler during the War. You can't prove it's not true. That doesn't make it a historical fact.

[longshadow]

Continuing Troll-Fest in Progress; Post at your own Risk

[RunningWolf]

//Roosevelt could have secretly visited Hitler during the War//

Roosevelt nor Hitler ever documented any of that, Lady Hope says this meeting happened.

That comparison is different by orders of magnitude. It is one of the many false comparison made. Frankly I would more expect this from the (one-liner hit job) posters you have rather than someone like you. We all know who they are, farm that sort of crap out to them.

A much more apt comparison would be if you have ever visited someone very sick or the home of someone just died. There might be only a few people at the house when you visit, maybe even just a family friend or house keeper, the family might be so much in shock and pre-occupied they might not remember that you were there later.

Wolf

[Dimensio]

He didn't raise it as a possibility, he raised it as a historical fact.

Moreover, he claimed that Darwin's own children testified that it was true. Now that ample evidence has been presented to show that his children said the exact opposite, he seems to have dishonestly "forgotten" about that claim.