Nothing needs straightening out but your chocolate eclair of a spine. A historical fact is the kind of thing easily shown to be true. What you claimed as historical fact is barely possible and by all credible accounts fiction.
Why is it better to be a brazen liar for absolutely all to see than wrong on an obscure and irrelevant point?
From your tag line: "...Creationism is a cancer on conservatism."
Why do you say that creationism is a cancer on conservatism when the bulk of conservatism is made up of creationists?