[TheBrotherhood]

>So Darwin's recanting has gone from "historical fact" to "theory of yours"

I was just explaining as to the reasons, or what made him recant.

[Dimensio]

I was just explaining as to the reasons, or what made him recant.

You have yet to demonstrate that Darwin recanted, you shameless liar. You provided one article whose authors concluded that they could not know whether or not Darwin converted. You have failed to provide any evidence whatsoever to support your inital claim that Darwin recanted. You have also been exposed as a liar on your claim that Darwin's "daughter/son" confirmed his recanting.

I have nothing more to say to you. You're clearly a totally shameless liar who continues to repeat the same obviously false claim even in the face of overwhelming evidence against you. I once thought that nmh was the biggest liar on FR. Clearly I was mistaken; clearly you are an even bigger liar than nmh.