[CarolinaGuitarman]

"From your post timestamp doesn't look like you read the entire convincing piece."

Why should I? It's the same old crap. You have ONE ambiguous source (*Lady Hope* never says he converted or that he recanted his theory) and extrapolations from that source that completely ignore what Darwin said and did the last 6 months of his life after this alleged encounter.

Why would he have NOT told his family of this change of mind? He had six months to inform his beloved wife that he accepted Christ... yet, nothing. Any historian who used this type of crappy source would be the laughingstock of his department. There is FAR too much counter-evidence that he NEVER recanted or became a Christian again before he died. You will only *convince* the ignorant and stupid with your *argument*. Darwin never recanted. Period.

[TheBrotherhood]

Me: "From your post timestamp doesn't look like you read the entire convincing piece."

You: "Why should I? It's the same old crap."

It's your choice to want to read it or not. But don't expect others to want to read your "same old crap."