[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Although the author leaves it to the reader to decide, the evidence is overwhelming that Lady Hope was the sole witness to Darwins' recanting his evolution theory, repentance and back into the arms of Jesus."

And her own words were that he didn't recant. Why are you STILL lying about this? Please explain to us WHY Darwin would have recanted to HER, and not to his wife who worried about his soul? Please explain how this can be logical.

[TheBrotherhood]

From your post timestamp doesn't look like you read the entire convincing piece.

Please take the time to read the whole piece and then get back to us, hopefully convinced and converted to the CREV-ID camp.

[RunningWolf]

These things can certainly happen. Lady Hope may have reawakend Darwin's long dormant faith when no one else had.

Your acceptance of this is NOT NEEDED for its truth to be.

Regards,

Wolf