[TheBrotherhood]

According to the above definitions evolution is a collection of beliefs known as dogma that gives rise to the cult of evolution.

Intelligent Design is on the borderline between theory and law.

An aside: Why isn't the bot (PH) responding to my post above? Will someone please animate the Bot? LOL! Just joking here, guys. Don't take it seriously. Sometimes I expect a fast and prompt answer and forget that the person may not be here at the moment. I'm sure when he comes online, he'll notice my intelligent posts and respond appropriately. I do not expect him to agree with me, only that he gives me not a vacuous and timid answer. LOL!

[Coyoteman]

According to the above definitions evolution is a collection of beliefs known as dogma that gives rise to the cult of evolution.

Intelligent Design is on the borderline between theory and law.

Your response demonstrates that you do not understand science, and that you are arguing from a largely religious orientation.

That's fine, but don't confuse what you are doing with science. And don't try to tell scientists how to do science unless you have gone to the trouble to learn some real science.

Hint: You will not learn science from creationist pamphlets and websites.

As for PH, you may not be hearing from him at all. Did you notice his tagline? It reads: (Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)

[whattajoke]

Um. Huh?

Let's review. Your first and only post before your #56 stated, in it's entirety:

Hey, bot, that article is a lot of nonsense. There is no connection between humans and chimps.

Then, your next post stated:

An aside: Why isn't the bot (PH) responding to my post above? Will someone please animate the Bot? LOL! Just joking here, guys. Don't take it seriously. Sometimes I expect a fast and prompt answer and forget that the person may not be here at the moment. I'm sure when he comes online, he'll notice my intelligent posts and respond appropriately. I do not expect him to agree with me, only that he gives me not a vacuous and timid answer. LOL!

Hmmm, now please do kindly point out to us vacuous and timid folks who accept science what your question to PatrickHenry was.

Then, read his tagline and understand why he's not wasting his time with you. You call him a, "bot," don't ask a question, then insult him for not answering your non-question.

You creationists never cease to amaze. Case in point, you also say: Intelligent Design is on the borderline between theory and law.

You have no idea how absurd that is, do you?

[b_sharp]

"Intelligent Design is on the borderline between theory and law.

Between theory and law? You mean you have come up with a completely new and separate category? You are important.

Just for your edification, theories do not graduate to laws, the two serve different purposes.

[Condorman]

Intelligent Design is on the borderline between theory and law.

Do you have an example of a scientific law that used to be a scientific theory?

[Ol' Dan Tucker]

Sometimes I expect a fast and prompt answer and forget that the person may not be here at the moment. I'm sure when he comes online, he'll notice my intelligent posts and respond appropriately.

I'm sure once he finds an intelligent post by you, he'll respond appropriately.

Just joking here. Don't take it seriously.